AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT (ADEA) OF 1967, AS AMENDED It also prohibits reprisal or retaliation for participating in the discrimination complaint process or for opposing any unlawful employment practice under Title VII. Title VII prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964, AS AMENDED Title VI prohibits discrimination on the bases of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance. TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964, AS AMENDED Substantially equal work means that the jobs require equal skills, effort, and responsibility, and that the jobs are performed under similar working conditions. It prohibits Federal agencies from paying employees of one sex lower wages than those of the opposite sex for performing substantially equal work. The EPA prohibits sex-based wage discrimination. FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1958, AS AMENDED (EQUAL PAY ACT OF 1963 ) These laws and regulations prohibit discrimination in employment on the bases of race, color, religion, sex (includes sexual harassment and discrimination based on pregnancy), disability (mental or physical), age, national origin, sexual orientation, protected genetic information, and retaliation for participation in EEO activity. How the LII Table of Popular Names works.The Office of Equity and Civil Rights (OECR) is charged with ensuring the agency is in compliance with the various laws and regulations that govern Federal-sector equal employment opportunity (EEO) and civil rights. It is usually found in the Note section attached to a relevant section of the Code, usually under a paragraph identified as the "Short Title". Instead, those who classify laws into the Code typically leave a note explaining how a particular law has been classified into the Code. Nor will a full-text search of the Code necessarily reveal where all the pieces have been scattered. As a result, often the law will not be found in one place neatly identified by its popular name. But this is not normally the case, and often different provisions of the law will logically belong in different, scattered locations in the Code. And as we said before, a particular law might be narrow in focus, making it both simple and sensible to move it wholesale into a particular slot in the Code. Sometimes classification is easy the law could be written with the Code in mind, and might specifically amend, extend, or repeal particular chunks of the existing Code, making it no great challenge to figure out how to classify its various parts. The process of incorporating a newly-passed piece of legislation into the Code is known as "classification" - essentially a process of deciding where in the logical organization of the Code the various parts of the particular law belong. (Of course, this isn't always the case some legislation deals with a fairly narrow range of related concerns.) Each of these individual provisions would, logically, belong in a different place in the Code. A farm bill, for instance, might contain provisions that affect the tax status of farmers, their management of land or treatment of the environment, a system of price limits or supports, and so on. On the other hand, legislation often contains bundles of topically unrelated provisions that collectively respond to a particular public need or problem. In theory, any law - or individual provisions within any law - passed by Congress should be classifiable into one or more slots in the framework of the Code. At its top level, it divides the world of legislation into fifty topically-organized Titles, and each Title is further subdivided into any number of logical subtopics. The United States Code is meant to be an organized, logical compilation of the laws passed by Congress.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |